Flash sucks. You can’t link directly to it. The search engines can’t read it. Do away with all flash.
No! Flash itself is not the problem, rather it is the implementation of flash that causes the problem. Any Flash application that does not allow a URL, a freakin’ link, to let me access a *particular space* within the application completely sucks. Links rule. You take away links and we, as usability experts, will point out that you have lost it according to
Al Gore Berners Lee.
Flash advocates, this one completely included, got carried away with what Flash COULD do and went overboard in the past building sites where usability was based on a journey, but not a context to be revisited like the Internet is with links. Now, Microsoft is repeating the same mistake with www.live.com. Just because you CAN built a completely AJAX application where the URL never changes doesn’t make it any more of a good idea than building a completely Flash web site. GIVE ME LINKS! REST PLEASE! (excuse the pun you nerds out there).
Where are the usability experts yelling about the lack of links on live.com? The world demands a 100% solution and if we get to 95%, well, it won’t work. That is just the law of nature. No links, no live.
Now, of course this begs the question of "if AJAX is so great for so many things, then why aren’t we actually using Flash more?" – and I really believe that we need to use Flash for many of the things that AJAX is being applied to because it is the web2.0-flavor-of-the-day.
And one more rant, please explain why WYSIWYG textarea fields aren’t built into EVERY browser as part of HTML? Please, this is 2005, stop making us work at that level and let us work on usability and the human problems, which are quite complex enough thank you.
<end Ed as programmer on social software team with www.tendenci.com hat day>