Category Archives: Art Community in Houston

Caroline Collective Coworking Space Anniversary

Houston’s own Caroline Collective Coworking Space is having an anniversary party this Saturday!

And a few more related links to the party THIS Saturday at Caroline.

1. Caroline link post:
2. Facebook invite:
3. Artshound:
4. Mentions on twitter:

I hope to make it on Saturday and hope to see y’all there too! From the announcement:

And a special thanks to the party sponsors step up to offer things to donate and would love to show them some love, including Riazul Tequila, Sweet Leaf Tea, Saint Arnold,, Tacos A-go-go, Danton’s Gulf Coast Seafood, and Aztec Party & Tent Rental.

Don’t Fight It will DJ and the illustrious (you)genious will serve as MC.

Houston Green Scene will be providing the party favors: 2″ biodegradable peat pots with organic potting soil and planted daisy seeds.

Houston Mayoral Forum on the Arts

Houston Arts Alliance, the Houston Museum District Association, and Houston Theater District present: The Houston Mayoral Forum on the Arts


Candidates for Mayor:Gene Locke, Roy Morales, Annise Parker, Peter Brown

Photos from the Houston Mayoral Forum on the Arts are posted by me on facebook as well as flickr and picasa. All are creative commons attribution and can be used WITH ATTRIBUTION.

Formation of New American Group Influencers

New groups are being formed throughout the country, and nobody has noticed. These emergent groups are zero to three years old. And the organizers are not the usual suspects. If there is a connection to urban tribes it is the connecting of existing urban tribes.happyface

We meet our new friends, talking to others we know through the same medium, and in introverted humility ask “oh, how do y’all know each other?” Assuming it predates our joining the group. But it doesn’t. We assume these eclectic people of diverse backgrounds knew each other selectively before the overall group formed. But they didn’t. It’s like everyone has the same social birthday. It all happened as part of the Great American Social Software Revolution. The grandparents were born in 2004.

And I am not convinced they, we, follow the RENGEN model.

It is simply like minded people. Who met through sites like Flickr and twitter, form groups. Old news, like 15 year old prodigy news, right? What is news is that about three years ago the local aspect got magnified somehow. Asynchronous communication on bulletin boards drifted not to synchronous, but on an exponential curve much closer to synchronous. And the closer the line moves to zero, the more local factors come into play.

Local is the new black. And these new local influencers, many previously also influential but with a new magnifying glass, are more powerful than ever. Or newly powerful.

And these new groups haven’t self-identified yet. And the leaders don’t even realize they are leaders. People who nominate themselves as leaders are frequently rejected. Like an atom that meets to form when it wants and then goes on to reject the laws of physics, a self-nominated enforcer is refuted.

This is startling in that there is no visible ideology to bind.

“A common sharing of ideas integrates individuals into the community, a group, a party, or a movement. Ideas, commonly held, define the things that are acceptable and the tasks to be accomplished, excluding all others.  Ideologies play the same role that totems and taboos play in primitive tribes, defining what is common to the members and what is alien.”

– Contemporary Political Ideologies, pg. 9, 1986

Yet there is no dominant ideology that can be seen by this writer. Liberals and conservatives and the rational majority that are not on either end of the spectrum all participate. The “unfollow” and “block” functions of twitter are natural enforcers.

The main take-away is not a new ideology so much as the awareness of the rapid fire formation of new influencers. Influencers who in a majority appear, ironically, “off the grid” to the current power structure.

As I close this post I find I am very convinced of

  1. the formation of new groups is very real
  2. there is no readily apparent ideology that binds
  3. the leaders are below the radar, the influence unmapped

The next 10 years will be interesting indeed!

Note: The image? No relation to the post. Just an image of happiness on my flickr stream. That is all.

Performance Art for HOT Funded Art Accountability

Woman in gallery
Wayne Dolcefino recently completed an expose called The Color of Money about Houston Hotel Occupancy Tax (HOT) dollars funding Art to increase art tourism in Houston. From his story on the ABC 13 web site:

HOUSTON (KTRK) — We've put aside millions of your dollars to get art for the city. So why is some of the money collecting dust for nearly a decade? Where's the art?

We've gotten an earful from artists about my supposed lack of culture because they are under the mistaken impression we spend tax money just to create art. In fact, we spend hotel tax money on art to bring in tourists to fill up hotel rooms.

That's why our focus is the color of money; your money.

This has been posted on the Houston Arts Alliance blog (a client) and commented on by several influential artists in the Houston Community. As well as on the ABC 13 site. How can you resist talking about a story that includes the phrase "Lesbian puppet theater"?

As best I can ascertain the themes of Wayne's report are:

  1. Some Art is inaccessible – art at a wastewater treatment plant is not attracting tourists and now it is behind locked doors in a post 9-11 world. Jonathon Glus in the interview agrees with Wayne that this art should be moved to be accessible saying: ""I think civic art monies need to be focused on very public spaces," This can and should be fixed.
  2. Everyday citizens may question if something is art, consider it bad art, or overpriced art at times. Fair enough. Yet we are limited in what we can do here. Specifically government must decide to fund art or not fund art, but it can't cross the first amendment.
    1. Nothing in the U.S. Constitution requires the government to spend taxpayer dollars to fund
      artistic expression. If the government chooses to fund the arts, however, it must do so
      in a manner consistent with the First Amendment
  3. It's YOUR Money. Or maybe it's not your money. The report opens with "your dollars" and day two has "You spend millions of dollars on art to bring in tourists." but later Wayne is careful to say "The millions we collect in hotel taxes are required to go to tourism, stadiums, conventions and art. " My take? During Hurricane Ike many of us stayed in hotels. So if it is HOT money at least a portion of it can be referred to as "my taxes".  I think this is semantics and not the point as far as I am concerned.
  4. Not much HOT Money has been spent on the most obvious tourist location – the Houston Museum District. And some signs have grafiti on them. And the "banners that are tattered." Hard to argue with this one. This can and should be fixed.
  5. Some people in the museum district make too much money. "$145,000 a year salary" and "compensation last year was $475,000 a year, but with bonuses it came to $888,173". Those are big numbers. But this is purely subjective and right now I am too busy being upset at AIG giving Christmas bonuses to worry about the cost of a world class curator. It's like sports – if you can earn it then good for you. That's just the American way. Dan Rather versus a local station. Sorry kiddo, life's not fair.
  6. Only one piece has been delivered.  True, but to be balanced perhaps look at the works refurbished as well? But on that note, deadlines do matter so this can improve with better oversight.

What did Wayne miss? Well, he was either kind (uncharacteristic, no?) or did not  know about ignoble past of the Cultural Arts Council of Houston and Harris County. The mismanagement at CACHH, as I understand it, even caused a backlash within the arts community. Did ABC13 report on this at the time?

One other aspect of the "story" that I have trouble with is going from "we shouldn't spend tax dollars on art" to "why aren't you spending tax dollars on art fast enough?" but I'll chalk that up to journalistic license.

What can Wayne do better next time?

  1. Be balanced. Interview a few people who LIKE art in the city of Houston! This is just basic journalism to look at the other side. I know, I know, Fox News, but still I can dream, right? Plus he might have found an art lover who was similarly outraged at timing/location/etc which might have led to constructive dialog.
  2. Give people a chance to respond before airing a sensational piece timed to show the week the National Arts Marketing Conference and the Latin Grammy's are in Houston. This was just a PT Barnumesque stunt that hurt the city in front of two very influential groups. Very clever I'll give you. But if it's all about ratings maybe I need to listen to my own advice "life's not fair".
  3. Release the FULL interview of Glus from the story as background material. At least the transcript. Soundbites with dramatic music are just silly and taken out of context destructive.

I was wondering what exactly are the duties of a journalist? Is it art, or reporting. And if art, shouldn't it be labelled as such?

From the National Union of Journalists Code of Professional Conduct it says things like "strive to eliminate distortion, news suppression and censorship" and "ensure that the information he or she disseminates is fair and accurate". So I'd have to say that reporting is more Art than Journalism in this case. And he is quite entertaining when your community is not the target of the attack. Like watching ultimate fighting I guess.

Dan Keeney (a client) had a constructive comment on the HAA Blog:

Love him or hate him, I think Wayne Dolcefino has plopped a big
stinkin….OPPORTUNITY in the lap of the Houston arts community. He
repeatedly has acknowledged that there is a direct connection between
the arts and the city’s economy, which is typically the hardest concept
for critics to grasp.

He is making that difficult argument on your
behalf — but he is also demanding accountability.

Hard to argue with Dan's point on accountability. HAA and the arts community should work to improve transparency and accountability. And the citizens and hopefully the media should help the entire city move in that direction. Just hopefully without ripping ourselves apart or timing it to make us look like backwater fools the week of the Arts Conference Wayne. Oh please, that wasjust disingenuous.

The bottom line for me?  I am going to view the whole thing as some amazing performance art with a few grains of truth. And for that I tip my hat to Mr. Dolcefino on a ratings grabbing performance. Now this way to The Egress please.

Disclaimers: HAA, Discovery Green, Dan Keeney and numerous others (over 300) actually are clients. Those that aren't clients, many are friends. I am sure I missed an asterisk somewhere, but this is a blog and I am not pretending to be impartial.

Economic Impact of Arts in Houston

Our lady of transportation from the Houston Art Car Parade
The Houston Arts Alliance is one of our clients, and I have been doing some research on the economic impact of the arts in Houston. It's very impressive actually.

Some data from the Houston Arts Alliance Blog from Mayor Bill White's recent talk on the arts.

  1. Arts are a 626.3 Million Dollar Industry in Houston
  2. The Arts in Houston support 30,000 full time jobs
  3. The economic impact for the city is 69.5 million in local and state government revenues
  4. Total Attendance of the 10 Largest Arts Organizations in 2007 = 7,383,740
  5. Total Hotel Occupancy Tax funds directed to the Arts in2007 = 12.1M


I mention this because I have been seeing the 13 Undercover teasers on TV for a show called "The Color of Money". I haven't seen the segment yet. Investigative Reporter Wayne Dolcefino runs "The Color of Money" about Houston Arts tonight at 10:00 PM.

As a tax payer it is important to me that my taxes go to logical and necessary expenses. But I also like knowing that there is a baseball team in Houston (stadium paid for with taxes), and while I can't always afford the beer at a Texan's game (ditto), I can always afford a glass of wine in the basement of the new building at the Houston Museum of Fine Art. Art is necessary. To what extent, that can and should be legitimately debated as with anything regarding public funding.

And again, the Houston Arts Alliance is a client so I am clearly biased. And I love the arts, so add a second bias to the first.

Trying to reserve judgment until I see the piece. But knowing Dolcefino….

Here is the Mayor's Funding for the Arts set: